Does each Component of Reactive Oxygen Species have a Dual Role in the Tumor Microenvironment?

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a class of highly reactive oxidizing molecules, including superoxide anion (O2•−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), among others. Moderate levels of ROS play a crucial role in regulating cellular signaling and maintaining cellular functions. However, abnormal ROS levels or persistent oxidative stress can lead to changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) that favor cancer development. This review provides an overview of ROS generation, structure, and properties, as well as their effects on various components of the TME. Contrary to previous studies, our findings reveal a dual effect of ROS on different components of the TME, whereby ROS can either enhance or inhibit certain factors, ultimately leading to the promotion or suppression of the TME. For example, H2O2 has dual effects on immune cells and non-cellular components within the TME, while O2•− has dual effects on T cells and fibroblasts. Furthermore, each component demonstrates distinct mechanisms of action and ranges of influence. In the final section of the article, we summarize the current clinical applications of ROS in cancer treatment and identify certain limitations associated with existing therapeutic approaches. Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of ROS, highlighting their dual effects on different components of the TME, and exploring the potential clinical applications that may pave the way for future treatment and prevention strategies.


INTRODUCTION
Tumor cells, immune cells, stromal cells (including vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, adipocytes, and stellate cells), and non-cellular components (such as the extracellular matrix (ECM), exosomes, and blood vessels) constitute the major constituents of the tumor *Address correspondence to these authors at the Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Sichuan Luzhou 646600, China, E-mails: adublg@126.com;zhangangxiao@swmu.edu.cn# These authors contributed equally to this work.
1875-533X/24 microenvironment (TME) (Fig. 1).However, the specific composition of these elements can vary depending on the tumor type [1,2].Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment (TME) and metabolic reprogramming are recognized as significant characteristics of modern cancer research [3].The interplay between cancer cells and ROS within the tumor microenvironment govern tumor progression at the intersection of these two pivotal biological phenomena [4][5][6].
ROS, which are molecules with short lifespans and unpaired electrons, are formed through the partial reduction of molecular oxygen.They encompass oxygen-derived compounds comprising highly labile oxy-gen-derived compounds comprising highly labile oxygen radicals such as superoxide (O 2 •− ) and hydroxyl (HO•) radicals, which can readily transform into more stable, freely diffusible non-radicals like hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and hypochlorous acid.Furthermore, ROS encompasses 1 O 2 , HOO•, and ClO• [7,8].ROS play a crucial role as signaling molecules in regulating the interactions among cellular and non-cellular compo-nents within the tumor microenvironment [9].Nevertheless, recent research has primarily focused on exploring the dual role of ROS specifically within tumor cells [10][11][12].A comprehensive examination of the impact of ROS on other components of the TME has not been thoroughly conducted.The primary focus of this paper is to investigate the dual effects of ROS on the various components of the TME.ROS can create a "favorable" environment for tumor cells by modulating the TME, which is characterized by acidity, hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, and inflammation [13][14][15].However, the role of ROS in the tumor microenvironment is multifaceted.This review comprehensively examines the generation, characteristics, and functions of ROS, as well as their impact on cancer development.Initially, it provides an overview of the sources of ROS, encompassing the mitochondrial respiratory chain, NADPH oxidases, and other enzymatic systems, while elucidating the properties and structures of ROS.Subsequently, it delves into the intricate interplay between ROS and the TME.Furthermore, it consolidates the current strategies for ROS-targeted cancer therapy and sheds light on their inherent limitations.Lastly, it synthesizes and discusses the patterns and extent of interactions between ROS and the TME, with the ultimate aim of exploring potential clinical applications.

The Origin, Structure, and Properties of H 2 O 2
The generation of endogenous H 2 O 2 in cells is intricately associated with mitochondrial activity, the endoplasmic reticulum, and NADPH oxidase [16].The superoxide radical is produced within the constituents of complex I and complex III of the mitochondrial electron transport chain [17].Moreover, the superoxide radical can serve as a precursor for the production of H 2 O 2 [18], which is then converted to H 2 O 2 through the action of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) [19].H 2 O 2 -producing enzymes are also present in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum.The most prevalent enzyme source is the flavoprotein ERO1, which collaborates with members of the protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) family of oxidoreductases.ERO1 facilitates the formation of disulfide bonds during the folding of newly synthesized polypeptides.Electrons released during disulfide bond formation are transferred from the nascent secretory protein to ERO1 via PDI.Subsequently, H 2 O 2 is generated as ERO1 transfers the received electrons from PDI to molecular oxygen [20].NADPH oxidase facilitates the transfer of electrons from NADPH to two distinct heme moieties through flavin adenine dinucleotide.This electron transfer process occurs towards molecular oxygen, serving as the electron acceptor.The resulting multimeric complex ultimately generates either superoxide or H 2 O 2 [21].Likewise, superoxide is catalyzed by su-peroxide dismutase (SOD), leading to the subsequent production of H 2 O 2 [22].Therefore, the collective production of H 2 O 2 in the mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and NADPH oxidase contributes to the overall oxidative stress response in the organism.
H 2 O 2 , with the chemical formula H-O-O-H, possesses a polar molecule structure consisting of both polar and nonpolar bonds.The oxygen atom (O) in H 2 O 2 carries an intermediate valence of -1.Due to its specific spatial arrangement, H 2 O 2 adopts a permanent dipole conformation, resulting in the molecule having a distinct separation of positive and negative charges [23].Furthermore, the presence of a permanent dipole in H 2 O 2 may have implications for cellular motor function and transport processes [24].This structural characteristic is intricately linked to the impact of H 2 O 2 on the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells as described below.
The properties of H 2 O 2 in the microenvironment encompass its oxidizing, conductive, and transformative characteristics.H 2 O 2 's inherent oxidative activity is manifested through the degradation of hemoglobin, enzyme inactivation, and release of iron, as well as the oxidation of lipids, DNA, ketones, and -SH groups [25].When H 2 O 2 induces oxidative stress in various components of the tumor microenvironment, it can generate a diverse array of "nutrients" that promote tumor growth.H 2 O 2 demonstrates excellent conductivity within the TME and may be the most suitable oxygen metabolite for signaling among various oxygen metabolites.This may be attributed to H 2 O 2 's ability to trigger multiple sensors and pathways during the signaling process, as well as regulate transcription factors at various levels.For instance, H 2 O 2 synthesizes transcription factors by upregulating transcription or increasing mRNA stability and translation or activates individual genes for DNA binding and nuclear transcription by targeting specific chromosomal regions [26,27].Given H 2 O 2 's numerous transduction targets and mechanisms, it frequently operates as a messenger in cell proliferation induction, mechanism activation, apoptosis, and anti-apoptosis within the TME.It is noteworthy that H 2 O 2 , in its role as a signal transmitter, induces cellular apoptosis through a concentration-dependent pathway.In a study exploring H 2 O 2 -induced apoptosis in melanoma cells, it was discovered that low concentrations of H 2 O 2 initially activate the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway.Conversely, high concentrations of H 2 O 2 trigger cell death and cancer cell apoptosis via a caspase-independent signaling pathway [28].H 2 O 2 is also capable of transformation.In a study, overexpression of rat acyl-coenzyme A oxidase (ACOX) was allowed in the non-tumorigenic rat uroepithelial cell line MYP3, leading to high levels of H 2 O 2 production in the organism.The resulting study demonstrated that H 2 O 2 exhibited tumorigenicity in thymus-free nude mice, suggesting a malignant transforming effect of H 2 O 2 on normal cells [29].These properties are closely associated with the effects of H 2 O 2 on the TME discussed later in the text.•− ), an intermediate reactive oxygen species, is primarily generated in isolated mitochondria, with complex I (ubiquinone oxidoreductase) and complex III (cytochrome bc1 complex; ubiquinone: cytochrome oxidoreductase) serving as the main sites of its production.Complex I, a multi-component complex consisting of 45 polypeptides, functions as the entry point for electrons derived from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) into the respiratory chain [30,31].Complex I generate substantial quantities of O 2 •− through two mechanisms.One of these mechanisms involves the reaction of isolated complex I with fully reduced flavin mononucleotide (FMN), resulting in the production of O 2

The
•− .The extent of FMN reduction depends on the ratio of NADH to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) [32].The rate of superoxide anion generation through complex I is regulated by the NAD-H/NAD ratio, which governs the electron transfer process [33].Another mechanism involves the generation of O 2 •− by complex I during reverse electron transport.In this process, a high membrane potential drives electrons to flow backward from coenzyme Q (CoQH2) to complex I, resulting in the reduction of NAD to NADH at the FMN site and the production of O 2 •− [34].
Ultimately, a large amount of O 2 •− is produced from complex-I [35].The ubiquinone oxidation center within complex III is responsible for the production of superoxide.The cytochrome bc1 complex, which consists of two homodimers, forms two ubiquinone reaction centers from cytochrome b on each side of the membrane [36].It forms the ubiquinone oxidation center, also known as center P or Qo site, on the positive side of the membrane, and the ubiquinone reduction center, also known as center N or Qi site, on the negative side of the membrane [37].Moreover, the generation of the superoxide anion occurs in the ubiquinone oxidation center [38].O 2 •− comprises a single anion and a single radical [39].The O-O bond length is 1.33 pm, and there is a σ bond and a 3-electron π bond within the ion.The 17--electron O 2 •− is a separable paramagnetic main group ion and is one of many oxygen reduction reaction intermediate species [40].
The O 2 •− possesses oxidizing and signaling activating properties.Its oxidative nature is attributed to its nucleophilic characteristics.When compounds in the tumor microenvironment are present, capable of donating hydrogen (H), such as tocopherol, ascorbic acid, or other positively charged substances, O 2 •− demonstrates strong nucleophilic reactivity.It selectively targets positively charged centers, initiating chemical reactions [25].The nucleophilic nature of O 2 •− contributes to the induction of oxidative stress in stromal cells.Additionally, O 2 •− possesses the ability to activate signaling pathways that have profound effects on cellular processes.For example, when exposed to O 2 •− and its intermediate oxidizing metabolites produced by phagocytes, the fibrosarcoma QR-32 cell line demonstrates metastatic behavior, indicating the involvement of O 2 •− in signaling and activation pathways.This can be attributed to the role of O 2 •− as a conductor of activating signals, which triggers the activation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, ultimately leading to the transformation of QR-32 fibrosarcoma cells into metastatic tumors [41].Another illustrative example is the stimulation of proliferation in lung cancer cells, wherein O 2 •− serves as an intracellular messenger within the ROS oncogenic signaling cascade.This highlights the involvement of O 2 •− in facilitating cell proliferation and underscores its significance as a key player in intracellular signaling processes associated with cancer development [42].In cases of leukemia, O 2 •− functions as a messenger for activation signals, initiating crucial signaling pathways such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) upstream pathways.This activation, in turn, leads to apoptosis in leukemic cells, further emphasizing the pivotal role of O 2 •− in regulating cellular processes and influencing disease outcomes [43].

The Origin, Structure, and Properties of HO•
Hydroxyl radical (HO•) is produced within mitochondria through the Fenton and Haber-Weiss chemical reactions.In the Fenton reaction (Equation 1), H 2 O 2 reacts with Fe 2+ of low valence to generate HO•, facilitated by the reduction of iron by O 2 •− in the presence of an iron catalyst (Equation 2).Additionally, ligands that promote redox cycling can enhance the chelation of iron catalysts, further influencing the generation of HO• [44].-+HO• HO• and its secondary product radicals possess one or more unpaired electrons, rendering them highly chemically reactive.As a result, they can engage in redox reactions with various substances within living organisms [46].
In the microenvironment, the HO• exhibits oxidative, conductive, and highly reactive properties.HO• is known for its strong oxidizing nature and its rapid reactivity with a wide range of inorganic and organic molecules in cells.These include proteins, amino acids, DNA,lipids,metals,and sugars [25].These characteristics of HO• are closely associated with its ability to modify DNA, induce DNA base lesions, and contribute to oxidative stress in the tumor microenvironment [47][48][49].HO• exhibits signaling properties, as demonstrated by Sumkhemthong's research group.Specifically, HO• functions as a signaling molecule that mediates the autophagic response in lung cancer cells.It confers resistance to the apoptotic effect of the drug cisplatin on cancer cells and promotes cell survival [50].HO•, being the most active free radical in biological systems, exhibits high reactivity and instability.Unlike the relatively stable O 2 •− , HO• is a short-lived species that readily interacts with other molecules.In studies involving apoptosis in HeLa, MW451, and 293 cells, it was observed that HO• could directly target telomeres, leading to telomere shortening and induction of apoptosis in cancer cells [51].2).Describes the ROS formation pathway in the body.The superoxide anion is mainly produced in complex I and complex III in mitochondria and relies on NADPH enzymosomes to transfer hydrogen.Hydrogen peroxide is mainly produced by superoxide anion catalyzed by SOD or by electron transfer from ERO1 and PDI enzymes of the endoplasmic reticulum to molecular oxygen.Hydrogen peroxide further undergoes the Fenton and Haber reactions to produce hydroxyl peroxyl.Phagocytic cells, the MPO, and the EPO systems produce singlet oxygen.The four ROS components are not produced independently but have a cascade relationship.(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

The Origin, Structure, and Properties of 1 O 2
There are two main mechanisms for the production of 1 O 2 .The first mechanism involves macrophages (including neutrophils, heart cells, and endothelial cells) accumulating in tissues exposed to oxidative stress or in various disease states.In this process, macrophages generate 1 O 2 through a spontaneous disproportionation reaction of O 2 •− , with the involvement of H 2 O 2 and NO•.Additionally, the microenvironment plays a significant role in extracellular 1 O 2 production, and research has demonstrated that an acidic cellular environment enhances 1 O 2 production by macrophages.
The excited state of molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) is characterized by having two paired electrons in its structure and a change in electron spin within the molecular orbital.It is an extremely unstable and highly reactive species [46,53].
1 O 2 is an excited form of molecular oxygen that displays high reactivity towards organic compounds rich in electrons, including polycyclic aromatic compounds, diolefins, and olefins [54].In a study involving Hepa hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, it was observed that 1 O 2 induced the peroxidation of unsaturated fatty acids within the cells.This lipid peroxidation process has been identified as a direct mediator of iron-induced apoptosis.Consequently, the pathway leading to iron-induced apoptosis in cancer cells can be activated by 1 O 2 , acting downstream of the cysteine-glutathione axis [55].Besides, 1 O 2 also inactivates SOD and peroxidase on the surface of cancer cells [56,57], which mediates apoptosis.Due to its exceptional reactivity, 1 O 2 exhibits significant cytotoxicity.The oxidation of crucial biological targets, such as lipids, proteins, or nucleic acids, by 1 O 2, can directly trigger cell death [58].
Given the structural and property variations among different ROS components, it is logical to inquire about the potential diversity in their effects on the tumor microenvironment.In the subsequent section, we will thoroughly examine the interplay between each ROS component and the various cellular and non-cellular elements within the TME.

ROS Suppress T-cell Function and Facilitate the Establishment of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 within the tumor microenvironment plays a significant role in promoting the TME by detrimentally affecting T cells, suppressing their immune functions, and impeding their proliferation, thereby facilitating tumorigenic progression.A study by Tan et al. illustrated this phenomenon in the context of hepatocarcinogenesis, where Lysyl oxidase-like 4 (LOXL4), secreted by tumor cells and predominantly localized in hepatic macrophages through exocytosis, catalyzes the conversion of amine groups, resulting in the generation of H 2 O 2 and ammonia as byproducts in a copper-dependent manner.Consequently, H 2 O 2 activates interferon (IFN)-associated Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs), leading to the upregulation of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).This process enables macrophages to interact with tumor-killing T cells, hindering T-cell activation, inducing functional impairment, and ultimately suppressing the immune microenvironment [59][60][61].In gastric and esophageal cancers, regulatory T (Treg) cells exhibit a notable resistance to apoptosis induced by H 2 O 2 compared to conventional T cells.This characteristic may result in a higher accumulation of Treg cells in the vicinity of the tumor within the tumor microenvironment, rather than an actual increase in the number of Treg cells influenced by chemical factors [62].Treg cells possess functional immunosuppressive properties within the tumor microenvironment, effectively suppressing immune responses of T effector cells.Moreover, elevated numbers of Treg cells are observed in various malignancies, indicating their increased presence in the tumor microenvironment [63,64].Kono et al. conducted a study showing that the secretion of H 2 O 2 by melanoma-associated macrophages or activated monocytes leads to a decrease in the expression of the cell surface CD3 complex.The CD3 complex plays a crucial role in initiating T cell proliferation and cytolytic function.Based on their findings, the researchers proposed that the inhibitory impact of H 2 O 2 on T cell function could be attributed to its influence on the expression of the CD3 complex [65].In an experiment conducted on glioma cells, it was observed that H 2 O 2 induced the expression of CYB561D2, an antioxidant protein.Additionally, H 2 O 2 activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in glioma cells.The increased expression of CYB561D2 and activation of STAT3 had immunosuppressive effects on T cells.Specifically, CYB561D2 inhibited the secretion of interleukin-2 (IL-2) from T cells in a STAT3-dependent manner.This immunosuppressive effect of H 2 O 2 on T cells, mediated by CYB561D2 and STAT3, could ultimately lead to T cell apoptosis and contribute to the immunosuppressive environment in gliomas [66].IL4I1, a phenylalanine oxidase, can be expressed by infiltrating macrophages and malignant cells in B-cell lymphomas and non-lymphoid tumors [67].In vivo, IL4I1, an immune regulatory enzyme, was found to oxidize phenylalanine, resulting in the production of phenyl pyruvic acid and H 2 O 2 .This H 2 O 2 generated by IL4I1 exhibited inhibitory effects on T lymphocyte proliferation.Interestingly, H 2 O 2 had a more pronounced inhibitory effect on memory T cells compared to other T cell subsets.It was observed that H 2 O 2 at micromolar concentrations had a greater impact on T lymphocyte proliferation inhibition.This suggests that H •− production in myeloid cells through a pathway that may involve the reductase structural domain of inducible NO synthase (iNOS).This increased O 2 •− production is implicated in the Arg1-dependent inhibition of T-cell function.These findings highlight the contribution of O 2 •− and the interplay between myeloid cells and T cells in shaping the immune response within the tumor microenvironment, particularly in colon cancer [70].Furthermore, additional research has indicated that in cases of melanoma, CD14(+) cells exert a suppressive influence on autologous T cells through a STAT-3, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and O 2 •− dependent mechanism.This orchestration of factors not only dampens the immune response but also fosters the progression of tumor development [71].
The impact of 1 O 2 on T cells has received limited investigation, with only a singular study demonstrating its capacity to induce mutual oxidative damage to telomeres and mitochondria within T cells.This dual effect of damage is contingent upon both the duration and intensity of exposure, ultimately culminating in T-cell senescence and potentially even fatality [72].Ultimately, it promotes the tumor cell microenvironment.

ROS Augment T-cell Activity and Impede the Progression of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 within the tumor microenvironment exerts its influence by augmenting T-cell immunosuppression and cytotoxicity, while concurrently facilitating T-cell activation to repress the tumor microenvironment.In an experimental model employing in vitro and in vivo approaches, specifically focusing on K-ras-driven pancreatic cancer, Glorieux et al. implemented antioxidants to mitigate H 2 O 2 levels.This intervention significantly attenuated the expression of programmed deathligand 1 (PD-L1) in K-ras mutant cells, consequently leading to increased T-cell infiltration within tumor tissues.This, in turn, enhanced the immunosuppressive functionality of T cells, resulting in impeded growth of tumor cells [73].Experimental data indicate that upon exposure of T lymphocytes from mice to mammary cell tumor cells, H 2 O 2 production occurs.Notably, H 2 O 2 becomes concentrated in the vicinity of target cells, rendering the sulfhydryl groups on these cells vulnerable to its effects.Through this mechanism, H 2 O 2 serves as a mediator, amplifying T-cell cytotoxicity and impeding the survival of cancer cells [74].In a study by Freund et al., it was observed that the treatment of CT26 colon cancer cells with an H 2 O 2 saline solution resulted in the upregulation of cell surface markers associated with anti-tumor immune response (referred to as ICD).This treatment also promoted T-cell activation.Concurrently, the levels of two anti-inflammatory factors, IL4 and IL10, were found to be elevated.Consequently, the growth of colon cancer cells was inhibited, and apoptosis was induced in the cancer cells [75].The presence of O 2 •− has been shown to enhance the cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes and suppress the tumor microenvironment.Lu et al. employed high-fluence, low-power laser irradiation (HF-LPLI) as a method to induce a significant release of O 2 •− .This resulted in the generation of large quantities of O 2 •− , which in turn extensively modified the phosphatidylserine fraction of oxidized tumor cells.This modification facilitated macrophage uptake and recognition of the tumor cells, ultimately leading to increased cytotoxicity of T lymphocytes and subsequent suppression of tumor growth [76].
The majority of studies examining the impact of HO• on T cells within the TME primarily concentrate on therapeutic applications.These investigations explore therapeutic strategies such as chemodynamic therapy, which involves the utilization of synergetic chemodynamic-photothermo-photocatalytic therapy combined with tetramodal imaging.This approach results in a substantial increase in the production of HO• through the stimulation of endogenous H 2 O 2 .Furthermore, HO• is implicated in the induction of mitochondrial damage.The reciprocal interaction and cyclic feedback between HO• and other ROS significantly augment the presence of cytotoxic cells and helper T lymphocytes in the tumor region.Consequently, these effects contribute to the effective activation of the immune response [77,78].

ROS Suppress B-cell Function and Foster the Establishment of a Conducive Tumor Microenvironment
Limited research has been conducted on the influence of H 2 O 2 on B cells within the microenvironment.One notable study by Farber et al. provided evidence that in cases of lymphocytic leukemia, B lymphocytes are susceptible to oxidative damage when exposed to H 2 O 2 in conjunction with T cells.Interestingly, this susceptibility of B cells to oxidative damage was found to be dependent on the presence of Ca 2+ .In contrast, T lymphocytes exhibited relatively higher resistance to the detrimental effects of H 2 O 2 [79,80].The majority of malignant lymphomas (90%) originate from B-lymphocytes within the lymphopoietic system, suggesting a potential link between B-lymphocytes and their increased susceptibility to ROS compared to T cells.However, it is important to note that the existing evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited and lacks substantial strength in the present study.Further research is needed to better understand the differential responses of B and T cells to ROS and their implications in lymphoma development.dim NK cells were more susceptible to apoptosis induced by physiological levels of H 2 O 2 compared to CD56 bright NK cells.Furthermore, there was a negative correlation between CD56 dim NK cell infiltration in tumors and H 2 O 2 production.Additionally, H 2 O 2 was found to impair the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity of tumor-associated NK cells [81].In breast cancer, Klopotowska et al. discovered that NK cells exhibit greater susceptibility to H 2 O 2 compared to T or B cells.As a result, the functionality of NK cells is substantially inhibited, leading to a reduction in their anti-tumor activity.The study also revealed that peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1), an essential component of the antioxidant defense system, is deficient in NK cells within the tumor microenvironment.This deficiency in PRDX1 may explain the heightened sensitivity of NK cells to H 2 O 2 [82].Furthermore, in melanoma, H 2 O 2 released by macrophages exerts an inhibitory effect on the promotion of tumor growth by NK cells.It leads to a reduction in the expression of the CD3 complex and CD16 complex in peripheral blood NK cells.This decrease in expression is associated with a decline in the cytolytic activity of NK cells and significantly impairs their effector function [65].H 2 O 2 plays a regulatory role in the tumor microenvironment, contributing to tumor growth by inhibiting the function of NK cells and inducing damage to these immune cells.

ROS Enhance the Function of NK Cells and Hinder the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 can enhance the migration rate of NK cells and exert an inhibitory effect on the tumor microenvironment.For instance, in the context of mast cell tumors, the P815 cell line acts as a "bystander" cell within the tumor microenvironment, releasing H 2 O 2 .This H 2 O 2 production facilitates the migration of NK cells toward target cells, thereby enhancing the efficiency of NK cells in eliminating these target cells [83].The impact of H 2 O 2 on NK cells within the tumor microenvironment is concentration-dependent.Low concentrations of H 2 O 2 have been shown to enhance the function of NK cells and their effectiveness in suppressing tumors.However, it's important to note that high concentrations of H 2 O 2 (above 10 μM) can induce apoptosis in NK cells.Therefore, when utilizing H 2 O 2 to promote tumor suppression through NK cells, careful consideration should be given to maintaining an appropriate and controlled concentration of H 2 O 2 to avoid detrimental effects on NK cell viability and function.

ROS Regulate the Activity of Macrophages and Promote the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 plays a role in promoting the tumor microenvironment by impairing the immune function of macrophages and evading their immune response.In the context of hepatocellular carcinogenesis, the expression of LOXL4, an amine oxidase involved in the remodeling of the extracellular matrix, is upregulated.The increased LOXL4 expression leads to the production of H 2 O 2 , which in turn activates STATs associated with interferon (IFN) signaling and induces the expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).The upregulated PD-L1 expression then acts to suppress the immune function of macrophages, contributing to an immune-suppressive microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma [61].Furthermore, it has been observed that H 2 O 2 at a concentration of 100μM in lung cancer cells induces oxidative stress, resulting in alterations in the structure of protein subunits.These structural changes may give rise to the formation of novel antigens, which could potentially aid tumor cells in evading the immune response of phagocytes.This phenomenon highlights the ability of H 2 O 2 to contribute to immune evasion mechanisms employed by tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment [84].
, in turn, plays a crucial role in enhancing the expression of C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2), which serves to recruit macrophages and facilitate the development of the tumor microenvironment.Specifically, in retinoblastoma-deficient tumors, CCL2 expression is upregulated through the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK).This activation leads to an increase in fatty acid oxidation, ultimately promoting the production of mitochondrial O 2 •− .The activation of the CCL2-CCR2 axis within the tumor microenvironment has been shown to contribute to various tumor types, including sarcoma and breast cancer.This axis serves to facilitate tumor angiogenesis and the recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as well as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which are known to exert immunosuppressive effects.Ultimately, these processes regulate the tumor microenvironment, promoting tumor growth in the aforementioned tumor types [85].

ROS Enhance the Function of Macrophages and Inhibit the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 plays a pivotal role in suppressing the tumor microenvironment by inducing alterations in the phenotype of macrophages.Sang et al. employed Iron Nanotrap as a means to target iron transport specifically to tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) within the tumor.By releasing iron from the Nanotrap, TAMs were reprogrammed and subjected to oxidative stress upon stimulation with H 2 O 2 .This reprogramming process resulted in the conversion of TAMs from a pro-tumor M2 phenotype to an anti-tumor M1 phenotype.Consequently, the reprogrammed TAMs exhibited the ability to elicit an immune response and suppress tumor survival, thereby contributing to the inhibition of tumor progression [86].
Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) has shown potential in inhibiting the tumor microenvironment by enhancing macrophage activity via O 2 •− .In the context of prostate cancer, PEDF plays a crucial role in macrophage recruitment and stimulates their polarization towards the classical activation pathway.By regulating the interaction between prostate cancer cells and macrophages, PEDF enhances the immune response of macrophages and promotes apoptosis of tumor cells.Experimental findings suggest that PEDF stimulates the production of O 2 •− by macrophages, which is implicated in the apoptotic process of cancer cells.However, further investigation is necessary to elucidate the precise regulatory mechanism underlying this phenomenon [87].HO• utilize the disguise of macrophage membranes to confer immune evasion properties to nano-catalysts.Through interaction with the catalyst α4/VCAM-1, macrophages gain the ability to recognize tumor endothelial cells and cancer cells, effectively suppressing the metastasis of breast cancer cells [88].

ROS Enhance Neutrophils and Inhibit the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
O 2 •− enhances the cytotoxicity of neutrophils against target cells and inhibits the tumor microenvironment.Ishihara et al. utilized PSK (a protein-bound polysaccharide) induction to elevate the levels of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) neutrophils, resulting in increased production of O 2 •− by neutrophils.This, in turn, led to heightened cytotoxicity of neutrophils towards their targets and a significant reduction in the number and size of metastatic foci in lung cancer cells.However, the precise mechanism through which O 2 •− enables neutrophils to exert cytotoxic effects and inhibit tumor metastasis remains unclear [89].Furthermore, the specific mechanism by which O 2 •− affects B cells, NK cells, and dendritic cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains uncertain and requires further investigation.HO• exploits neutrophils to facilitate immune responses and suppress the tumor microenvironment.Under conditions where the neutrophil defense system is overwhelmed and the microenvironment provides oxidized iron, neutrophils generate and release HO• through iron-catalyzed reactions of superoxide.This process serves to eliminate potential pathogens and mediate the innate immune response [90,91].Ultimately, HO• inhibits the tumor cell microenvironment.

ROS Exploit Neutrophils to Promote the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
HO• utilizes neutrophils, inducing oxidative stress and ultimately modulating the tumor microenvironment.In cases of gastric cancer associated with H. pylori infection, the presence of virulence factors in H. pylori can attract neutrophils that harbor γ-glutamyl transferase, leading to the generation of different ROS, including H 2 O 2 and highly reactive HO•.Prolonged oxidative stress in the infected area results in DNA damage and chronic inflammation, establishing a favorable inflammatory milieu for the survival of tumor cells [92].

ROS Enhance the Activity of Endothelial Cells and Benefit the Progression of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 contributes to the promotion of the tumor microenvironment and sustains tumor cell survival primarily by enhancing the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells.Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important factor involved in angiogenesis, and its upregulation facilitates the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells [93], and endothelial cells provide nutrients to support tumor growth and development [94].In human prostate cancer, there exists a notable correlation between the expression of VEG-F-C, a growth factor with a specific affinity for heparin and vascular endothelial cells, and the occurrence of lymph node metastasis [95,96].Muders et al. discovered that in prostate cancer, stimulation with H 2 O 2 leads to an increase in the phosphorylation of serinethreonine kinase AKT-1 and promotes endothelial cell proliferation within cancer cells through the action of VEGF-C.This process renders serine-threonine kinase AKT-1 resistant to inactivation, thereby enabling its continuous activation.The activation of AKT-1 is mediated by mTOR complex 2 (mTORC-2) within the tumor microenvironment, which protects prostate cancer cells from undergoing H 2 O 2 -induced cell death [97].Furthermore, when exposed to H 2 O 2 , CV-MSCs (mesenchymal stem cells/stromal cells derived from human-term placental chorionic villi) demonstrate a protective effect on endothelial cells, mitigating the harmful impacts of oxidative stress [98].This phenomenon may be attributed to the modified expression of p53 in CV-MSCs within the breast cancer microenvironment, thereby endowing them with certain capabilities to counteract oxidative stress [99].In colon cancer, low levels of H 2 O 2 have been shown to enhance the expression of vascular endothelial growth factors in cancer cells, stimulating the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells.Consequently, this facilitates increased nutrient supply to cancer cells [100].O 2 •− , also known as superoxide, has been found to enhance vascular endothelial cell migration, thereby promoting the tumor microenvironment.David et al. employed MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to identify protein spots associated with melanoma development.Through their analysis, they observed a substantial increase in proteins involved in O 2 •− production, glycolysis, inflammation, and other processes.Furthermore, the induction of O 2 •− resulted in a significant upregula-tion of VEGF, which further stimulated vascular endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis [101].

ROS Modify the Behavior of Fibroblasts and Reinforce the Progression of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 plays a role in promoting the tumor microenvironment in fibroblasts by influencing protein expression, oxidative stress, and phenotypic changes.Specifically, in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), H 2 O 2 induces the upregulation of Hydrogen peroxide-inducible clone 5 (HIC-5) in cancer-associated fibroblasts present in the tumor stroma.HIC-5, in turn, regulates the migration and invasion of ESCC cells by modulating cytokines and altering the ECM.This interplay between H 2 O 2 , HIC-5, fibroblasts, and ESCC cells contributes to the dynamic tumor microenvironment in ESCC [102].Frequent mutations and deletions of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are observed in hereditary ovarian cancer.In the context of BRCA1-deficient cancer cells, these cells produce elevated levels of H 2 O 2 , which results in oxidative stress and catabolic effects on neighboring stromal fibroblasts.This phenomenon is mediated through the activation of stromal NF-κB, a transcription factor.Consequently, the activated NF-κB pathway leads to the reprogramming of tumor mesenchymal metabolism.This metabolic reprogramming drives mesenchymal-epithelial metabolic coupling, a critical process promoting the development of lethal tumors in the context of BRCA1 deficiency [103].In human breast cancer, H 2 O 2 is capable of diffusing easily through the cell membrane and exerting its effects on surrounding fibroblasts.When exposed to acute stress, fibroblasts respond by increasing the expression of Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF) and chemokine CXCL12.This molecular signaling leads to the transformation of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts, which are characterized by their high contractility and expression of smooth muscle α-actin (SM-α-actin).These activated myofibroblasts play a significant role in promoting the migration and spread of tumor cells within the breast cancer microenvironment [104].Furthermore, H 2 O 2 generated by cancer cells elicits oxidative stress in adjacent fibroblasts, culminating in the substantial production of copious quantities of L-lactic acid.This metabolic byproduct serves as a pivotal "fuel" for fostering the proliferation and metabolic activities of breast cancer cells [105].This intricate process unfolds within the TME of breast cancer, whereby cancer cells emit H 2 O 2 into the surrounding milieu, instigating oxidative stress and triggering the production of H 2 O 2 within neighboring cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs).Subsequently, these CAFs undergo aerobic glycolysis, generating substantial quantities of energy-dense "fuel" such as ketone bodies, lactate, pyruvate, and fatty acids.Remarkably, this energy-rich "fuel" is then harnessed by cancer cells to sustain their growth and proliferative endeavors [106][107][108].Furthermore, the secretion of H 2 O 2 by CAFs emulates the modus operandi of immune cells such as neutrophils and macrophages, instigating the body's innate immune response mediated by NF-κB.Consequently, this cascade triggers both local and systemic inflammation, thereby fostering an environment conducive to the survival of cancer cells [109].In the context of prostate cancer, H 2 O 2 governs distinct translational regulations of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) in both cancer cells and CAFs.Specifically, H 2 O 2 directly impedes the activity of the MMP-3 promoter in CAFs, consequently suppressing the nuclear translocation of NF-κB and leading to diminished MMP-3 expression in CAFs.Conversely, H 2 O 2 induces the upregulation of microRNA-128 in prostate cancer cells, which in turn reduces the expression of thrombospondin 2 (a repressor of MMP-3).Consequently, MMP-3 expression in cancer cells is elevated, facilitating the maintenance of ECM homeostasis [110].Therefore, H 2 O 2 exerts control over the TME by modulating the behavior of fibroblasts, including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), thereby shaping the TME to create a favorable environment for tumor growth.
O 2 •− promotes the tumor microenvironment by stimulating autophagy in cancer cells and enhancing the role of fibroblasts.In breast cancer, O 2 •− induces tumor cells to trigger autophagy in neighboring cancer-associated fibroblasts by suppressing Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) expression.Autophagy occurring in the tumor stroma generates high-energy nutrients that support cancer cell metabolism and facilitate their growth [6,111,112].Extracellular superoxide dismutase (EcSOD) serves as the sole extracellular enzyme responsible for scavenging O 2 •− .An interesting finding by Golden et al. revealed that the overexpression of EcSOD in breast cancer cells had inhibitory effects on hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-induced phosphorylation of the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase.This, in turn, resulted in the suppression of cancer-fibroblast interactions and the inhibition of three-dimensional (3D) stromal gel growth of MDA-MB231 cells, a breast cancer cell line.These observations suggest that O 2 •− production enhances HGF-mediated interactions between cancer cells and fibroblasts, thereby promoting the tumor microenvironment [113].

ROS Change the Resilience of Fibroblasts and Deter the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 plays a suppressive role in the tumor microenvironment by enhancing the stimulation of the Fibroblast-FGF2 system.Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), a key member of the fibroblast growth factor family, is primarily secreted by fibroblasts.H 2 O 2 , in this context, enhances the activation of the Fibroblast-FGF2 system, thereby exerting suppressive effects on the tumor microenvironment [114].Ma et al. discovered that H 2 O 2 amplifies the retention of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase ½ (pERK1/2) in the cytoplasm and the binding of kinase pGSK3β (Tyr-216) in the peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor cell line SK-N-MC, under the stimulation of the Fibroblast-FGF2 system.Furthermore, the experimental findings revealed that the FGF2-induced modulation of phosphorylation and accumulation of pERK1/2 in the cytoplasm exerts a cytotoxic inhibitory effect on SK-N-MC cells, ultimately leading to apoptosis [115].The impact of H 2 O 2 on adipocytes and stellate cells within the stromal cells of the TME remains poorly elucidated and necessitates additional research for comprehensive understanding.O 2 •− , through its action on fibroblasts, can upregulate the expression of the tumor suppressor protein p53 and inhibit the fibroblast-mediated proliferation of cancer cells.Wang et al. conducted a study on the prostate cancer cell line PC3 and found that fibroblasts secrete basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which promotes the growth of PC3 cells.However, it was observed that a specific concentration of O 2 •− can significantly hinder the proliferation of cancer cells mediated by fibroblast-derived bFGF.This inhibitory effect is attributed to the upregulation of p53 expression induced by O 2 •− [116].

ROS Promote Angiogenesis and Enhance the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 , as a signaling molecule produced by the Nox1 gene (a homolog of gp91phox), plays a role in upregulating the protein expression of VEGF and promoting angiogenesis [117].Nox1 gene expression in tumor cells leads to a significant upregulation of VEGF mRNA expression through the action of H 2 O 2 .This molecular mechanism promotes tumor angiogenesis •− , there was a rapid increase in cellular VEGF mRNA levels.This increase was found to be dose-dependent, meaning that higher levels of O 2 •− resulted in greater VEGF expression.The enhanced angiogenesis induced by O 2 •− contributed to the promotion of tumor growth [119].Further investigation is required to elucidate the mechanism by which O 2 •− , or superoxide, influences non-cellular constituents, including the ECM and exosomes.HO• triggers gene expression and facilitates angiogenesis within the microenvironment.In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the oxidative stress induced by HO• modifies the expression of BRAK and IL-8 genes in human HNSCC cells via the EGFR/MEK/ERK pathway, thereby promoting angiogenesis and facilitating tumor progression [120].

ROS Inhibit Angiogenesis and Impede the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
H 2 O 2 functions as an inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis by modifying the protein structure of the VEGF receptor.Peroxiredoxin II (PrxII), an important antioxidant enzyme, plays a crucial role in this process.Dong et al. conducted a study revealing that the absence of PrxII resulted in a substantial increase in intracellular H 2 O 2 levels, leading to oxidative inactivation caused by the altered protein structure of VEGF receptor-2.Consequently, VEGF receptor-2 loses its responsiveness to VEGF stimulation, ultimately inhibiting tumor angiogenesis in vivo [121].

ROS Promote ECM Production and Impede the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
There is limited research exploring the effects of H 2 O 2 on the ECM.Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that lysyl oxidase (LOX) plays a role in catalyzing the cross-linking of elastin and collagen within the ECM.This enzymatic process contributes to the regulation of tissue tensile strength [122].This process plays a crucial role in the migration of cancer cells.Additionally, LOX has been found to facilitate the formation of ECM adhesions and inhibit the migration of invasive breast cancer cells.These effects are mediated by H 2 O 2 and involve the FAK/Src pathway [123].
The role of 1 O 2 in the ECM is not extensively investigated.However, existing studies indicate that 1 O 2 interacts with amino acid residues within proteins, generating active substances that facilitate cross-linking of the ECM.This cross-linking process enhances the ECM's resistance to degradation by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which are responsible for breaking down the ECM and facilitating tumor cell metastasis.As a result, 1 O 2 inhibits the migration of invasive tumor cells [124].

ROS Degrade ECM and Facilitate the Development of the Tumor Microenvironment
HO• increases the expression of MMPs, leading to the degradation of the ECM and promoting the tumor microenvironment.Furthermore, HO• enhances the process of macromolecular damage to cells mediated by reactive oxygen species and activates MMPs, resulting in heightened invasiveness of cancer cells [125].However, the investigation of the effects of HO• on stromal cells is predominantly lacking in current research (Fig. 3).

ANTICANCER THERAPIES INVOLVING ROS MANIPULATION
Based on the previous analysis, it is evident that ROS is a crucial metabolic byproduct within the tumor microenvironment.It participates in tumorigenesis and tumor progression through various mechanisms, including direct cellular damage, promotion of apoptosis, induction of cell proliferation and migration, and modulation of cell signaling pathways.Consequently, research on utilizing ROS for tumor treatment has become a prominent focus in current studies.
Currently, the use of ROS in tumor therapy primarily revolves around several approaches, namely antioxidant therapy, peroxide therapy, targeted ROS therapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapy.

Antioxidant Therapy
Antioxidant therapy is a treatment approach that involves the use of drugs or other methods to reduce excessive free radical activity within the body.Its purpose is to alleviate oxidative stress-induced damage to tissues and organs and to counteract the carcinogenic effects of ROS.This therapy primarily works by in-hibiting ROS generation pathways or by enhancing the clearance of ROS through various antioxidants, thus reducing the ROS levels within tumor cells.Carvedilol, for example, exhibits the ability to eliminate ROS generation induced by Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), thereby safeguarding normal cells from DNA damage and suppressing the malignant proliferation of breast epithelial cells [126].In line with this, the administration of DHLA (dihydrolipoic acid) effectively prevented the formation of ROS in cells treated with Tetrachlorohydroquinone (TCHQ) and significantly suppressed the development of skin tumors induced by TCHQ [127].The utilization of antioxidants, either as standalone agents or in conjunction with conventional anticancer medications, holds promise as an effective therapeutic approach to mitigate ROS-mediated tumorigenesis and disease progression in the organism.Extensive data derived from in vivo and in vitro experiments have substantiated the effectiveness of antioxidants (either alone or in combination) in suppressing tumor cell growth (as summarized in Table 2).
Nevertheless, certain clinical trials investigating the use of antioxidants for tumor treatment have revealed limitations and, in some cases, even an elevated risk of cancer [128][129][130].Several potential explanations can account for this phenomenon.Firstly, the substantial inhibition of oxidative stress can potentially promote the proliferation of cancer cells [131][132][133].Secondly, antioxidants have the ability to impede the apoptosis triggered by ROS, which can consequently hinder the normal apoptosis process in cancer cells [134].Therefore, it is crucial to conduct research aimed at minimizing the potential risk of antioxidants promoting tumor development.This endeavor can lead to the development of more clinically appropriate treatment modalities.

Oxidative Therapy
Oxidative therapy involves further increasing ROS levels to a toxic level, activating multiple cell death pathways, enhancing chemosensitivity, and opening up new avenues for cancer treatment [10].The primary objective is to elevate ROS levels by utilizing ROS generation inducers and suppressing antioxidants.As an illustration, upregulating p53 expression and downregulating superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) expression through the use of Astragalus purpureus led to heightened ROS levels and activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, effectively impeding the growth and proliferation of liver tumor cells [135].The efficacy of Deoxyelephantopin in reducing the viability of osteosarcoma cells is dependent on the dosage.It achieves this by promoting the generation of ROS, activating apoptosis-related proteins like Bax, and induc-ing mitochondrial dysfunction [136].Several studies and clinical trials have investigated the inhibition of tumor cells by increasing ROS levels (Table 3).However, it is important to note that solely increasing ROS concentration as a treatment approach for tumors may have undesirable effects.Inducing ROS through certain agents can disrupt the redox balance in tumor cells, potentially leading to DNA damage, cell genome mutations, tumor initiation, or increased survival of tumor cells [137,138].Overall, it appears that tumor cells have higher levels of ROS compared to normal cells, which makes anti-ROS therapy a targeted approach for treating tumors.However, achieving the right balance of anti-ROS agents and inducing ROS production in clinical research to achieve therapeutic goals without causing harmful or even contradictory side effects still requires further improvement.

Targeted ROS Therapy
Targeted ROS therapy primarily involves the use of specific targeted molecules such as nanomaterials and small molecules to selectively target specific ROS molecules for treatment.Based on their action sites and mechanisms, targeted ROS molecules can be classified into those targeting ROS generation, ROS signaling pathways, and ROS scavenging, among others.For example, researchers have developed targeted peptide precursor nanodrugs that conjugate with the ROS-sensitive sulfone group, linked with the cytotoxin epothilone B. These nanodrugs exhibit high-level targeting of ROS generation and release epothilone B upon cleavage, demonstrating remarkable tumor selectivity and excellent anti-cancer efficiency in both in vitro and in vivo studies [139].Targeted ROS therapy also includes photodynamic therapy and combination chemotherapy [140,141].Targeted ROS therapy offers the advantages of strong specificity, significant efficacy, and minimal side effects.By precisely targeting ROS for treatment, this approach can minimize damage to normal cells and improve therapeutic outcomes.Currently, targeted ROS therapy has been widely applied in clinical tumor treatment, particularly for lung cancer, liver cancer, and other types of tumors [142,143].
Although targeted ROS therapy holds certain application value, it also presents several challenges and limitations.For instance, in certain specific tumors such as melanoma, the presence of melanin enhances oxidative stress defense and may have defective apoptotic pathways, posing a challenge in developing efficient and specific targeted ROS drugs [144].In summary, targeted ROS therapy holds promise in tumor treatment, but it also faces challenges and limitations.Therefore, future research should focus on exploring highly efficient and specific targeted ROS drugs, as well as investigating their combination with other treatment modalities to enhance therapeutic efficacy and minimize side effects.

Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy utilizes ROS as a target for treatment, aiming to enhance the body's antioxidant capacity and strengthen the immune system's ability to eliminate tumor cells, thereby achieving the goal of tumor therapy.ROS-based immunotherapy encompasses various approaches, including autophagic cell death and inflammation modulators.For instance, a chemical photothermal nano-platform has been developed to activate immune sites using ROS, mediating cancer cell apoptosis and autophagic death to enhance treatment efficacy [145].
Targeting ROS as a therapeutic target in immunotherapy holds significant importance as it can enhance the body's antioxidant capacity and augment the immune system's cytotoxicity against tumor cells, thereby facilitating tumor treatment.However, further understanding of the specific mechanisms and potential risks of ROS in immunotherapy is necessary to provide scientific guidance for its clinical application.

Combination Therapy
Combination therapy refers to the use of two or more different treatment modalities together to enhance therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects.In the context of utilizing ROS as a target for immunotherapy, combining ROS inhibitors with chemotherapy drugs, immunotherapy agents, or other treatment modalities can enhance treatment effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects [146,147].Combination therapies can include ROS inhibitors in conjunction with chemotherapy drugs, ROS inhibitors combined with immunotherapy agents, ROS-releasing agents combined with chemotherapy drugs, and ROS-releasing agents combined with immunotherapy agents.
Although combination therapy can improve treatment outcomes and reduce side effects, it is crucial to consider factors such as drug interactions, dosages, and administration methods.It is important to undertake combination therapy under the guidance of a healthcare professional to ensure treatment safety and efficacy.

CONCLUSION
Based on the previous discussion, it is evident that many current therapeutic strategies are based on the direct impact of ROS on tumor cells.Moreover, whether it is antioxidation, peroxidation, targeted ROS therapy, or immunotherapy, etc., all exhibit certain drawbacks and side effects.Hence, it is apparent that solely adjusting the ROS levels may not always lead to optimal treatment outcomes.Can we, then, derive novel therapeutic approaches from the relationship between ROS and TME?Firstly, by examining their interactions, we can identify certain patterns and potentially establish a foundation for innovative treatment strategies.
First and foremost, among the various components of ROS, H 2 O 2 exhibits the most extensive influence on the tumor microenvironment.This can be attributed to the dual impact of H 2 O 2 on immune cells such as T cells, B cells, NK cells, and phagocytes, as well as stromal cells including endothelial cells and fibroblasts.Additionally, H 2 O 2 affects non-cellular components such as blood vessels and ECM.In terms of magnitude, the remaining components, namely O 2•− , HO•, and 1 O 2 , also exert dual effects, albeit to a lesser extent.This observation may be attributed to H 2 O 2 's ability to activate multiple sensors and pathways involved in sig-nal transduction, as discussed in the previous article.For instance, H 2 O 2 enhances signaling by promoting the upregulation of transcription or by increasing mR-NA stability and translation to facilitate the synthesis of transcription factors [26,27].Furthermore, due to its ability to target various transduction pathways and mechanisms, H 2 O 2 offers a unique opportunity to regulate genes and signaling with remarkable precision.
Secondly, H 2 O 2 displayed the highest sensitivity to the influence of the tumor microenvironment.This is evident from the findings presented in Table 4, where Zhu et al. experimented to investigate the upregulation of H 2 O 2 on vascular endothelial growth factor.Notably, even at a concentration as low as 10 -3 μM, H 2 O 2 induced the migration of endothelial cells within the microenvironment of colon cancer [100].Nevertheless, it should be noted that the other ROS exhibited minimum effective concentrations greater than 10 -3 μM.
Thirdly, it is worth noting that the action concentration of 1 O 2 is relatively low.Unlike the other ROS concentrations in Table 4, which were mostly above 1 μM, there was only one instance of 2x10 -1 μM MG2I (a chemical fluorogen) used to induce 1 O 2 production.From this, we can infer that 1 O 2 exerts its effects on the TME under low-concentration conditions.This can be attributed to the low concentration of the inducer MG2I and the volatile nature of 1 O 2 itself.Despite its unstable structure and short half-life, 1 O 2 , being a diolefin with high reactivity, remains effective even at low concentrations [54].
Fourthly, H 2 O 2 exhibits its effects across a wide range of concentrations.As observed in Table 4, the acconcentrations of H 2 O 2 in the TME span from 10 -3 μM to 5x10 4 µM.It is crucial to emphasize that H 2 O 2 can elicit contrasting effects on the same component of the TME at the same concentration.For instance, different experiments conducted by Bang and Freund demonstrated that 100 µM of H 2 O 2 yielded opposing effects on T cells, namely enhancement, and inhibition, respectively [66,75].However, it is important to consider that the microenvironments of T cells in the two studies were different: one was in the glioma microenvironment, while the other was in the colon cancer microenvironment.Consequently, the same concentration of H 2 O 2 may yield opposite effects on T cells in different tumor types.Therefore, when conducting research or clinical treatment involving H 2 O 2 , careful consideration should be given to the specific tumor type under investigation.
Fifth, it is noteworthy that the four ROS components do not exhibit dual actions simultaneously on the same component within the TME.For instance, H 2 O 2 promotes ECM, O 2 •− promotes endothelial cells, HO• inhibits ECM, and 1 O 2 inhibits T cells.As a result, whether the ROS components have a dual effect on the overall TME environment requires individual investigation and cannot be generalized.
Based on the legislation and the effects of ROS on various components of the TME outlined in Table 1, it may be possible to select specific ROS treatments based on different tumor types, tumor microenvironments, and concentrations employed.For instance, taking into consideration the abundance of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in breast cancer, Agnieszka's research team discovered that H 2 O 2 excessively activated the JNK1 stress signaling pathway within the cancer stroma.This resulted in the acquisition of a CAF-like phenotype and promoted tumor invasion in breast fibroblasts.Conversely, inhibiting the activation of JNK1 signaling by reducing H 2 O 2 levels using the peroxidase PRDX1 effectively mitigated breast fibroblast invasion and tumor development [148].Moreover, the synergistic administration of lactoferrin and black tea polyphenols has been shown to effectively suppress the generation of HO• and O 2 •− in hamster buccal pouch carcinoma.This combined treatment strategy exhibits inhibitory effects on tumor angiogenesis, providing a promising approach for impeding the formation of new blood vessels in the tumor microenvironment [149].Consequently, the treatment of tumors with ROS is not solely centered around directly suppressing malignant cells but also revolves around the pivotal influence of ROS on the protective barrier of tumors, known as the tumor microenvironment.
In pursuing ROS-based interventions for the TME, adherence to three overarching guidelines is warranted.Firstly, drug administration ought to align with the specific tumor type and its distinct microenvironment.Secondly, diverse ROS components manifest distinct impacts, thus cautioning against a generalized approach to ROS dosing.Thirdly, even when dealing with the same ROS, disparate concentrations yield inconsistent outcomes, necessitating vigilance regarding alterations in blood levels.
To adhere to these recommendations, several strategies can be employed in the development and utilization of clinical drugs.Primarily, it is advisable to focus on designing drugs that specifically target individual ROS components.Additionally, the utilization of in vitro cell/organ drug sensitivity assays can aid in deter-mining the optimal efficacy and dosage concentrations before drug administration.Furthermore, each ROS component should be thoroughly investigated to identify specific dosing markers that provide precise dosing instructions and therapeutic targets (Fig 4).However, it is worth noting that there is a dearth of therapeutic studies exploring the modulation of ROS in the tumor microenvironment for tumor eradication, despite its promising potential in targeting TME's crucial role in tumor development.Therefore, further research focusing on ROS components with high specificity for the TME is eagerly anticipated to advance effective tumor treatments.

Fig. ( 1
Fig. (1).Describes the components of TME and the relationship between various components.TME mainly includes immune cells, stromal cells, and non-cellular components such as ECM.The components of TME coordinate with each other and are closely related.(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

Fig. (
Fig. (2).Describes the ROS formation pathway in the body.The superoxide anion is mainly produced in complex I and complex III in mitochondria and relies on NADPH enzymosomes to transfer hydrogen.Hydrogen peroxide is mainly produced by superoxide anion catalyzed by SOD or by electron transfer from ERO1 and PDI enzymes of the endoplasmic reticulum to molecular oxygen.Hydrogen peroxide further undergoes the Fenton and Haber reactions to produce hydroxyl peroxyl.Phagocytic cells, the MPO, and the EPO systems produce singlet oxygen.The four ROS components are not produced independently but have a cascade relationship.(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).
2 O 2 , produced by IL4I1-mediated phenylalanine oxidation, plays a role in modulating T cell responses, particularly affecting memory T cells [68].Indeed, impaired T cell function in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has been associated with alterations in T-cell receptor (TCR)-mediated signal transduction.In the context of ovarian cancer, Lockhart et al. demonstrated that H 2 O 2 produced by tumor-derived macrophages could contribute to the loss of TCR expression and affect the secretion of high molecular weight factors by certain tumor cells.The loss or decreased expression levels of TCR signaling chains can further impair T cell function, including their ability to recognize and respond to tumor antigens.These modifications in TCR-mediated signal transduction pathways highlight the role of H 2 O 2 in the tumor microenvironment in influencing T cell functionality within the context of ovarian cancer [69].Other mechanisms by which H 2 O 2 interacts with T cells to inhibit TME are listed in Table 1.Indeed, O 2 •− plays a role in promoting the tumor microenvironment by inhibiting T-cell proliferation and immune responses.Bronte et al. demonstrated that arginase 1 (Arg1) is involved in the mechanism by which myeloid suppressor cells (MSC) inhibit T cell proliferation in colon cancer.Arg1 increases O 2

H 2 O
2 contributes to the promotion of the tumor microenvironment by compromising the activity of natural killer (NK) cells and suppressing immune function.A study conducted by Izawa et al. investigated CD56 dim /CD56 bright NK cells in gastric and esophageal cancers and observed that CD56

Fig
Fig. (3).The effect of each component of ROS on the TME component.(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

Fig
Fig. (4).Depicts the change of ROS effect on TME with the change of ROS level.At low concentrations, ROS mainly plays a role in signal transduction.With the occurrence of the tumor, ROS promotes tumor invasion and metastasis, proliferation, and mitochondrial damage.When the concentration of ROS reached a certain level, the apoptosis and DNA damage of cells in the TME environment were induced more.The graph shows existing treatment strategies for this condition.In addition, future research directions are proposed based on the relationship between ROS and TME.(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

Table 1 . The effect of each component of ROS on TME and experimental results.
(Table1) contd....

Table 3 . Increasing ROS levels allows tumor cells to reach a critical state and induce inhibition or death.
(